SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2680

T.RAVINDRAN
B. Radhamani – Appellant
Versus
S. Charubala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P. Valliappan.
For the Respondents: Mr. T. Balaji.

JUDGMENT :

In this second appeal, challenge is made to the Judgement and Decree dated 18.09.2002 passed in A.S.No.101 of 2001 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Coimbatore, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 25.10.1999 passed in O.S.No.329 of 1994 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for recovery of money.

4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that on 20.03.1991, the defendant executed a promissory note for Rs.30,000/- for valuable consideration at Perur Village, Coimbatore Taluk in favour of the plaintiff promising to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum on demand and on 20.09.1991, the defendant paid a sum of Rs.3,600/- towards interest for 6 months ending 20.09.1991 and failed to pay the amount thereafter in spite of repeated requests and demands and the plaintiff has learnt that the defendant had entered into an agreement with one Ayyasamy S/o Subbayya Naidu of Perur village to execute a sale in his favour in respect of her immovable properties with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against her. On 13.01.1994,

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top