SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2754

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Chandrasekar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Ashok Kumar, SC for K.S. Karthik Raja
For the Respondent: K. Prabakaran, APP

JUDGMENT :

G. Jayachandran, J.

1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Special Judge, Krishnagiri in Spl. C.C. No. 46 of 2007 holding both the accused K. Chandrasekar (A1) Senior Grade Inspector and E. Vijaya (A2) Assistant Commercial Tax Officer working at Hosur Commercial Tax Check Post guilty of the offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial Court sentenced the accused to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention Corruption Act, 1988 and to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, the legal representatives of Chandrasekar (A1) had preferred Crl.A. No. 333 of 2017 and the second accused Vijaya had preferred Crl.A. No. 735 of 2016.

2. The facts leading to these appeals are as follows:

M/s. Aishwarya Handloom Private Lim








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top