SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2943

T.RAVINDRAN
Duraisamy – Appellant
Versus
S. Saravanakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
R. Nalliayappan, T.S. Vijayaraghavan

JUDGMENT :

T. Ravindran, J.

In this second appeal, challenge is made to the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2014 passed in A.S.No.56 of 2013 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Salem, reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2013 passed in O.S. No.859 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for rectification and Permanent injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that his father and mother purchased the property from the defendants of an extent of 0.09 cents of land equivalent to 3924 sq. ft. within the spefic boundaries, namely, east of Harur main road, south of Pappammal land, west and north of the land of the vendors by way of the registered sale deed dated 23.04.1986 registered as document No. 610/1986 on the file of the office of the Sub Registrar Office, Ayyothiyapattinam and has been enjoying the same as the absolute owners of the property and the said property has been described in the plaint A schedule. However, the survey number in the abovesaid sale deed has been wrongly noted as S.F.No.94/1 instead of S.F.No.95/1, however, the boundaries abovestat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top