SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3009

T.RAVINDRAN
Rangammal – Appellant
Versus
Nallappa Reddiar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T. Dhanyakumar, Adv., C. Kulanthaivel, Adv.

JUDGMENT

T. Ravindran, J.

In this second appeal, challenge is made to the judgment and decree dated 02.03.2015 passed in A.S.No.23 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court (Trainee District Judge), Namakkal, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2012 passed in O.S. No.131 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal.

2. Parties are referred to as per their rankings in the trial Court.

3. Suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction.

4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that he has filed the rough plan along with the plaint, and given the ancestral properties belonging to him at Rettaiyampatti village in survey number 777/16 as P1, P2,P3,P4 and P5 and described the property belonging to the defendants as D and the P5 portion as described in the plaint is a lane and the plaintiff is residing in P2 portion in a hut put up therein and paying taxes to the panchayat and the plaintiff is producing the patta issued in his favour in patta number 213 as well his brother Marama Reddiyar and Marama Reddiyar, being a bachelor, delivered the possession of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff and accordingly it is onl

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top