SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3032

M.DHANDAPANI
K. Sureshkumar – Appellant
Versus
Badhrudheen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Doraisamy, Adv.

JUDGMENT

M. Dhandapani, J.

This criminal revision has been filed seeking to set aside the order in C.M.P.No.7477 of 2016 in STC.No.175 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court (Fast Track Court No.2), Erode, dated 21.12.2016.

2. The petitioner is the accused and the respondent is the defacto complainant. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as 'accused' and 'complainant'.

3. The complainant initiated proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in STC.No.175 of 2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.2, Erode, against the accused in respect of the Cheque bearing number 334436', dated 09.11.2015 drawn in State Bank of India, Anthiyur Branch. After examination of witnesses, the matter was posted for questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.

4. After completion of questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., the accused filed C.M.P.No.7477 of 2016 in STC.No.175 of 2016 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking to send the Cheque for Expert opinion. The complainant filed counter in the said petition. Thereafter, the said petition was dismissed on the ground that the request of the accused is no


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top