SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3080

M.SUNDAR
K. V. RAJENDRAN @ VARUN – Appellant
Versus
A. R. MURUGADOSS – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M. Purushothaman, P.H. Arvindh Pandiyan, M.V. Vijayan Subramaninan, J. Ravindran, Shankarkrishnamurthy, Adv.

JUDGMENT

M. Sundar, J.

There is one plaintiff and there are three defendants in this suit.

2. It is submitted by all parties to the lis that the main suit itself has been amicably settled between the parties to this suit.

3. Today, sole plaintiff Mr.K.V.Rajendran @ Varun is present in Court along with his counsel Mr.M.Purushothaman. Likewise, defendant No.1 Mr.A.R.Murugadoss is also present in Court along with his counsel Mr.Vijayan Subramanian who is lead by Mr.P.H.Aravindh Pandian, Senior Counsel.

4. With regard to second defendant, Commercial Division is informed that the second defendant is a juristic person and it goes by the name 'Sun TV Network Limited'. In other words, it is a public limited company though it has been described as 'Sun Pictures' in the cause title. Mr.M.Jyothi Basu, authorised signatory of the second defendant is before this Commercial Division along with Mr.J.Ravindran, learned counsel representing Ms.M.Sneha, counsel on record for the second defendant.

5. With regard to third defendant, Mr.K.Bhagyaraj, President of the third defendant entity is present al







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top