SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3099

R.THARANI
PRESIDENT, M D 105, DINDIGUL AIDED HIGH COURT – Appellant
Versus
T. PANDI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
V.O.S. Kalaiselvam, Adv.

JUDGMENT

R. Tharani, J.

Heard Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. This petition has been filed to direct the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul to entertain the I.A.No. Unnumbered/2015 (.2/3805/2015) in P.W.No.2 of 2014.

3. The petitioner herein is the respondent and the respondent herein is the petitioner in P.W.2 of 2014 filed before the Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul. The respondent herein has filed a petition in P.W.No.2 of 2014 before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul for payment of arrears of salary from 01.07.2011 to 30.04.2014 to the tune of Rs. 2,71,408/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy One Thousand Four Hundred and Eight only). The petitioner herein has filed an unnumbered I.A. Petition to reopen the case and to review the order passed in P.W.No.2 of 2014 dated 22.11.2014. The petitioner has filed the review petition along with a condone delay petition. The review petition was returned stating that the Commissioner has no power to review his own order. Hence, the petitioner herein has filed the present revision petition.

4. On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that when there is apparent error on the face of the order, there












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top