V.K.TAHILRAMANI, M.DURAISWAMY
Sekar Stores Home Mart Rep by Its Partner S. V. S. Manivannan – Appellant
Versus
Authorized Officer Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction & Securitisation Company Ltd – Respondent
M. Duraiswamy, J.
Since the issues involved in both the Writ Petitions are identical and between the same parties, the Writ Petitions are disposed of by this common order.
2. The petitioners have filed the Writ Petitions to issue writs of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent made in AIR (SA).Nos.154 & 156 of 2018 dated 03.09.2018 and to quash the same and to direct the 3rd respondent to take up the appeals filed by the petitioners without insisting on the mandatory deposit in terms of 2nd proviso to Section 18 of SARFAESI Act and to decide the case on merits and in accordance with law.
3. Challenging the orders passed in S.A.Nos.115 & 116 of 2013 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal III, Chennai, the petitioners filed appeals in AIR (SA).Nos.154 & 156 of 2018 respectively. In the said appeals, the petitioners filed I.A.No.483 of 2018 in AIR (SA).No.154 of 2018 and I.A.No.487 of 2018 in AIR (SA).No.156 of 2018 for waiver of pre-deposit. In both the appeals pending on the file of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, the petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal III, Chennai, which affirmed the possessio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.