SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3227

G.JAYACHANDRAN
R. Renuka – Appellant
Versus
N. Krishnakumari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shankar Murali

JUDGMENT :

G. Jayachandran, J.

The appellants herein, are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.437 of 2010. Appeal is against the dismissal of the suit filed for bare injunction against the respondents by the trial Court in OS.No.437 of 2010 and confirmed by the Appellate Court in A.S.No.51 of 2014 against which the present Second Appeal is preferred.

2. Before the Additional Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli, appellants herein have preferred O.S. No. 437 of 2010 against the respondents Krishnakumari and Narendraraj. Whereas, the second respondent herein, Narendraraj has preferred the suit O.S.No.158 of 2008 against the appellants 2 to 6. Both the suits are for the relief of injunction inrespect of suit schedule property which was purchased by Sundararaj through Court auction.

3. The property being a joint family property which devolved upon Veerasamy, who is the grand father of the plaintiff in O.S.No.158 of 2008. The property has been bequeath to the plaintiff in O.S.No.158 of 2008 through the will dated 13.10.1983 executed by Veerasamy Naidu. After death of Veerasamy, the entire suit property is in possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs. Both the appellants herein and the respondents have filed th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top