SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3302

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Valarmathi – Appellant
Versus
Rangasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Ashok Kumar, Adv., A.K. Kumarasamy, Adv., N.S. Sivaprakash, Adv.

JUDGMENT

RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

1. The unsuccessful private complainant is the appellant herein. The appellant is the wife of the first accused/first respondent herein. The second accused is the second wife of the first accused as has been alleged in the complaint and the third accused is the mother-in-law of the appellant/private complainant. The fourth accused is the sister of the first accused and sixth accused is the father of the second accused and seventh accused is the mother of the second accused.

2. The appellant herein has preferred a private complaint for the alleged offence punishable under section 494 read with Section 109 of IPC and under Section 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the accused. According to the appellant, the marriage between her and the first accused was solemnized on 10.04.1989 and out of the wedlock, one Son and one Daughter have born. During the subsistence of the said legal wed lock, the son born to the de-facto complainant and the first accused died due to medical complications at the age of 13. After the death of the son, the matrimonial relationship between the private complainant/appellant and first accused/first respondent got strained. Taking
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top