SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3392

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
District Health Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J. Gunaseelan Muthiah, M.S. Balasubramania Iyer.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal has been filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District and by the District Health Officer, Ramanathapuram District against the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram at Madurai in O.S. No. 26 of 1989 dated 25.07.1990. The appellants were the defendants in the suit.

2. O.S. No. 26 of 1989 had been filed by the plaintiffs with respect to the suit property, which was described as 25 acres and 20 cents in S. No. 518 Rameswaram Village in Ramanathapuram District comprised in patta No. 925. It was stated that the family of the plaintiffs has been holding the suit property for about eight or nine decades. The patta originally stood in the name of Neelaganda S. Mahadeva Iyer. He had three sons namely, Neelakanda Joshi, Sindamani Rao Joshi and Radhakrishnan Joshi.

3. The first son died and his wife and two sons are the plaintiffs 2 and 3. The second son also died and his son is the fourth plaintiff. His another son also died and his legal heir is the fifth plaintiff. The third son is the sixth plaintiff and his sons are the seventh and eight plaintiffs. They are descendants of Neelaganda S. Mahadeva Iyer.



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top