SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3416

N.KIRUBAKARAN, S.BASKARAN
Delphine Mary – Appellant
Versus
Saleth Mary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J. Antony Jesus, P. Sesubalan Raja.

JUDGMENT

1. The appeal has been preferred by the defendant as against the judgment and decree dated 17.03.2017 passed in the suit filed by the respondents for partition of the properties belonging to one Parisutham Nadar, husband of the 1st respondent and father of the appellant as well as the 2nd respondent.

2. The suit "A" Schedule " B" Schedule and "C" Schedule properties belong to the father Parisutham Nadar, having been purchased by him and he died intestate on 11.12.2001 leaving behind the appellant as well as the respondents to inherit the properties. Therefore, the suit for partition has been filed.

3. The younger daughter of Parisutham Nadar, namely, the appellant herein was shown as the defendant, who contended that not only "A" schedule, "B" schedule and "C" schedule properties, but also "D" schedule property, i.e. land and house bearing Door No. 4, Nirmala Nagar, Vallam Road, Thanjavur Town also belongs to Parisutham Nadar, having purchased the said property in his wife's name, the 1st respondent herein. Therefore, all the properties have to be included for partition. It is the further case of the appellant/defendant that "D" Schedule property was purchased by Parisutham N


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top