N.KIRUBAKARAN, S.BASKARAN
Delphine Mary – Appellant
Versus
Saleth Mary – Respondent
1. The appeal has been preferred by the defendant as against the judgment and decree dated 17.03.2017 passed in the suit filed by the respondents for partition of the properties belonging to one Parisutham Nadar, husband of the 1st respondent and father of the appellant as well as the 2nd respondent.
2. The suit "A" Schedule " B" Schedule and "C" Schedule properties belong to the father Parisutham Nadar, having been purchased by him and he died intestate on 11.12.2001 leaving behind the appellant as well as the respondents to inherit the properties. Therefore, the suit for partition has been filed.
3. The younger daughter of Parisutham Nadar, namely, the appellant herein was shown as the defendant, who contended that not only "A" schedule, "B" schedule and "C" schedule properties, but also "D" schedule property, i.e. land and house bearing Door No. 4, Nirmala Nagar, Vallam Road, Thanjavur Town also belongs to Parisutham Nadar, having purchased the said property in his wife's name, the 1st respondent herein. Therefore, all the properties have to be included for partition. It is the further case of the appellant/defendant that "D" Schedule property was purchased by Parisutham N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.