SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2770

T.RAVINDRAN
P. Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
R. Gopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : H. Adaikala Arokiaraj
For the Respondent: S. Arokia Maniraj

JUDGMENT :

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the Judgement and Decree dated 15.09.2012 passed in A.S.No.19 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Harur, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 06.04.2011 passed in O.S.No.178 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri.

2. The second appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law :

“(a).The lower appellate Court has also failed to see that if at all original document namely patta in the present suit is given as a security for the loan, no person will sign an agreement for sale. The respondent/defendant herein has entered into an agreement of sale and submitted his original patta to the plaintiff/appellant?

(b). Though the respondent/defendant pleads that he is an illiterate and without reading the document signed the document namely Exhibit A1, PW1 has stated that in cross examination that he has read over the content to the respondent/defendant and after that only the respondent/defendant signed Exhibit A1?

(c). Whether the lower appellate Court is correct in calculating the period for filing the suit?

(d). Whether the lower appellate is right in coming to the conclusion that t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top