1. This revisions petitions were filed under section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. by the Petitioners/Accused (A2 and A3) against the dismissal of their discharge petitions filed under section 239 of Cr.P.C by the Learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai in Crl.M.P.Nos.821 & 822 of 2014 in C.C.No.9400 of 2010 by the common order dated 15.2.2017. The revision petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.392 of 2007 is accused No.3 namely Abdul Razzak and accused No.2 namely Murugan is the revision petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.393 of 2007.

2. The brief case of the revision petitioners are as follows:

The case of the Revision Petitioners is that one Mohammed Hayath, accused No.1, working as the Project Co-ordinator in a computer software company by name “soft Solution” owned by the defecto complainant namely Senthil Kumar, committed an offence of hacking of hard disc owned by the defecto complainant and used the source code for his personal gains. Based on the complaint, a case has been registered by the respondent police against A1 in Crime No.1 of 2005, under sec. 65 of the Information Technology Act r/w 408 of IPC. Subsequently the respondent police laid the charge sheet as against A1