SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2830

M.V.MURALIDARAN
S. Chandran – Appellant
Versus
R. Sundaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sundar Mohan.
For the Respondent: V.R. Rajasekaran.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the order of acquittal in S.T.C. No. 1628 of 2006 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate

2. The case of the Appellant/Complainant is as follows: On 14.1.2006 the Respondent herein issued a post dated cheque bearing No. 251170 drawn on S.D.C. Co Operative Bank, Kangavalli Branch for the amount of Rs.15 Lakhs borrowed from the Appellant/ Complainant on 21.10.2005 and executed a pro-note in favour of the Appellant. The Respondent/Accused requested the Appellant/Complainant to present the cheque for collection on 28.9.2006 and accordingly the cheque was presented and on the same day it was dishonoured due to “funds insufficient”. The Appellant/Complainant issued Mandatory Notice dated 5.10.2016. After the expiry of 15 days the Respondent/Accused sent his reply on 18.10.2006. As the Respondent failed to make payment, the Appellant/ Complainant preferred the complaint.

3. The Respondent/Accused completely denied the case of the Appellant that he borrowed Rs. 15 Lakhs from the Appellant/Complainant, execution of pro-note dated 21.10.2005 and issuance of cheque dated 21.4.2006. There was no liability on the part of him in honour to the che
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top