SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2840

M.VENUGOPAL, R.PONGIAPPAN
Kaliammal – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Dharmapuri District – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Nalini Chidambaram, C. Uma.
For the Respondent: J. Pothiraj.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard both sides.

2. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents.

3. According to the Petitioner, she purchased the land measuring an extent of 0.3.00 hectares in Survey No. 58/2A and an extent of 0.36.00 hectares in S. No. 58/2B, 0.3.00 hectares in S. No. 59/6A, 0.24.5 hectares in S. No. 59/6B in Devarajapalayam Village in Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District, by virtue of the registered sale deed dated 10.11.1996 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

4. The stand of the Petitioner is that at the time of purchase, she had not known that the said land is a Government Assigned Land. She had invested considerable amounts and developed the said land by digging up the well and planted 13 Teak trees, 90 coconut trees, drumstick trees and other trees. Furthermore, by virtue of proceedings dated 04.08.2012 of the 2nd Respondent, it was mentioned that the land in S. No. 58/2A measuring an extent of 0.03.0 hectares in Devarajapalayam Village in Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District was assigned in the name of Adi Dravidar subject to conditions. However, a non Adi Dravidar is enjoying the said land by virtue of the sale





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top