SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 2935

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, TANGEDCO, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Poornima, Advocate.
For the Respondents: M. Varunkumar, Standing Counsel, (TNEB).

JUDGMENT :

1. The order of rejection issued by the 2nd respondent in proceedings dated 28.08.2017 for providing Electricity service connection to the writ petitioner's agricultural land is under challenge in this writ petition.

2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner states that the property belongs to the writ petitioner situated at S.No.27/1 measuring 1.81.cents, T.Mudiyanur Village, Thirukoilur Taluk, Villupuram District.

3. The writ petitioner purchased the property on 27.01.2016, which is an agricultural land. The writ petitioner is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the said property and doing agricultural activities. The petitioner submitted an application seeking Electricity service connection for agricultural purposes. The case of the writ petitioner was negatived on the ground that the 3rd respondent filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.78/2017 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Thirukoilur for declaration and permanent injunction.

4. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner made a submission that there is no interim order operating against the writ petitioner as well as the official respondents 1 & 2. Mere pendency of a Civil Suit will not be a bar fo





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top