SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3438

P.RAJAMANICKAM
Pandarinathan – Appellant
Versus
Ramasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Jagadeesan, Adv., S. Sivakumar, Adv., A. Muruganandam, Adv.

JUDGMENT

P. Rajamanickam, J.

This review application has been filed by the respondents in S.A.No.1658 of 2000 to review the judgment and decree passed by the Hon'ble Ms.Justice K.B.K. Vasuki in S.A.No.1658 of 2000 dated 07.08.2015. Since the Hon'ble Ms.Justice K.B.K. Vasuki retired, this review application has been posted before me.

2. The brief facts are as follows :

One Rukmaniammal had filed a suit in O.S.No.76 of 1988 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Ariyalur against one Ramasamy, Vijayaraghavan, Andalammal and Others to declare the settlement deed dated 08.03.1985 executed by the said Rukmaniammal in favour of the said Ramasamy and Vijayaraghavan on the ground of fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence. The said Ramasamy and Vijayaraghavan have filed a suit in O.S.No.58 of 1990 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Ariyalur against one Pandarinathan, Madhavan and Muthukrishnan to declare their title over the suit property on the basis of the settlement deed dated 08.03.1985 executed by the said Rukmaniammal and for consequential permanent injunction or alternatively for recovery of possession with mesne profits. The said Andalammal had filed a suit in O.S.No.59 of 1990 on the file of th
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top