SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3557

S.RAMATHILAGAM
Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Chinnathambi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
G. Bharadwaj, Adv., N.U. Prasanna, Adv.

JUDGMENT

S. RAMATHILAGAM, J.

1. The appellant/Employees State Insurance Corporation has preferred this appeal against the order passed in ESIOP No.12 of 2005, on the file of the Employees State Insurance Court (II ADJ) at Pondicherry dated 13.01.2010 and set aside the same.

2. The brief facts leading to the Claim Application is as follows:-

(i) The petitioner's son by name Palani was working in Appasamy Ocular Devices (P) Ltd., as Electrician for the past 1=years. Since there was no canteen facility in the said Company, his son used to come home for lunch and go back for work.

(ii) On 6.5.2005, as usual, the said Palani went home and after taking his lunch, he was returning in his motorcycle to his Company and at that time, one lorry dashed against him and he died. The said Palani was a member in ESI Corporation and also died during the course of his employment. The petitioner also sent a letter to the respondent, claiming the dependent benefits. But, the respondent refused to sanction the same by stating that the accident could not be deemed to have arisen during the course of employment. Hence, the petition was filed claiming dependent benefits from the employer.

(iii) The appellant he






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top