M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Rajendiran – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
M. Nirmal Kumar, J.
The appellant is the accused No.1 in S.C.406 of 2007 on the file of the Sessions Court (Mahila Court) Cuddalore. The appellant along with two others who were charged and tried for an offence under Section 316 of the Indian Penal Code. On conclusion of trial, the Trial Court had convicted the appellant and had acquitted the other two accused. In the above case the prosecution had examined 10 witnesses and had marked Exs.P1 to P6. No witness were examined and no documents were marked by the accused.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.06.2005 at about 09.00 a.m. the accused had cut a tree in the garden of PW1, when it was questioned, the accused had assaulted the said Saraswathy by hands and kicked on her stomach, due to which, she had a forcible abortion, for which she had preferred a complaint. On completion of investigation the prosecution had filed the charge sheet against the appellant and two others.
3. Pw1 victim states that the appellant/first accused had kicked her, due to which she felled down and further, he kicked on her stomach, the other accused had pulled her legs and they also abused her, due to the fall, she developed stomach pain an
Prabhat alias Bhai Narayan Wagh & Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.