SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3735

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, T.KRISHNAVALLI
N. Senthil Nath – Appellant
Versus
Karthigai Selvi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Tamil Mani, Adv., P. Velmurugan, Adv.

JUDGMENT

T. KRISHNAVALLI, J.

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree passed in HMOP No.470 of 2005, dated 21.04.2015 by the Family Court, Madurai.

2. The case of the appellant/husband is that the marriage between him and the respondent/wife was solemnized on 13.02.2004 at Master Mahal, Madurai. From the date of marriage, he had not been leading a happy life with her. The wife told the appellant/husband that she was not willing to marry him and she was compelled by her parents and she was not interested to lead the life with the husband. Despite his best efforts, the wife has not come forward and did not show any interest in sharing the conjugal life. Subsequently, the respondent/wife and her family members threatened the appellant/husband over phone by using un-parliamentary words and on 13.08.2005, the brother of his wife Muruganantham came with two men to the office of the appellant/husband and threatened him by stating that if he wants divorce, he should pay Rs. 30 Lakhs to the respondent/wife, otherwise he would be killed. When the appellant/husband contacted his Advocate and informed the happenings, his Advocate advised that since the matte







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top