SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3746

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Chinnakrishnappa – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T. Arulraj, Adv., A. Shrijayanthy, Adv.

JUDGMENT

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

1. The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to issue patta in favour of the petitioner in Bopallapuram Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District bearing Survey Nos.16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4 and 16/5, measuring 1.14, 0.48, 0.15, 0.24 and 0.19 hectares respectively.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that the property in Bopallapuram Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District bearing Survey Nos.16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4 and 16/5, measuring 1.14, 0.48, 0.15, 0.24 and 0.19 hectares respectively had been alloted to the petitioner by the Special Tahsildar, Hosur in proceedings in Na.Ka.424/84 dated 10.12.1974 for the purpose of cultivating mulberry. In view of the fact that the writ petitioner is in possession of the property described in the writ petition, he had planted mulberry on the land and cultivating the same. The lease period was for 5 years from 10.12.1974. The writ petitioner by putting his efforts, converted the waste land into the cultivable land. In view of th

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top