SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3800

P.RAJAMANICKAM
VELLIKANNAN (DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
KUPPAMMAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M. Venkatakrishnan, Adv., S. Thirunavukkarasu, Adv.

JUDGMENT

P. RAJAMANICKAM, J.

1. This second appeal has been filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai in A.S.No.23 of 2000 and A.S.No.30 of 2000 dated 12.04.2000.

2. One Chinnakuzhandhai Ammal had filed a suit in O.S.No.917 of 1991 on the file of the District Munsif, Arni, to declare her title over the suit property and to restrain the defendants by means of permanent injunction from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. During pendency of the said suit, the said Chinnakuzhandhai Ammal died and hence her legal representatives have been impleaded as plaintiff Nos.2 to 4. The learned District Munsif by the judgment dated 29.04.1997 has decreed the suit partly. He granted decree for declaration of plaintiff's title in respect of the land situated in S.No.27/5 measuring about 24 cents. He also granted decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment in respect of the trees situated on the A-C line as mentioned in Exs.C4 and C5. However, he dismissed the suit in respect of the trees situated on A-B line as mentioned in Ex.C4






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top