BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
Nelson Jesudasan - Appellant
Versus
State Represented By Deputy Superintendent of Police CBI - Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 885, 886, 887 of 2017; Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10846 to 10854 of 2017
Decided on : 19-09-2018
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 338, 37 and 325 - Tortuous Liability - These three revision petitions are preferred who were tried as accused for offence and found guilty by trial court and confirmed by appellate court - Before adverting to controverted facts and grounds of revision a brief extract of admitted facts is required for easy appreciation - Eye hospital was established under aegis of tamil evangelical lutheran church a registered society formed with object of imparting education and to render medical care - Eye hospital is administered by medical board constituted as per memorandum of association - Cataract surgery was performed to patients at eye hospital a unit of eye hospital - On that night most of patients complaint about excruciating pain in operated eye nausea and giddiness - Next day they were given treatment and admitted in hospital - Lost their vision of operated eye partially lost vision of their operated eye – Held, Therefore it is liable to be set aside - At same time vicarious liability of management under law of torts cannot be wiped of - Therefore compensation fixed by Trial Court based on workmen compensation act shall hold good - Further if any of victims deserves higher compensation than what fixed by Trial Court and paid they are at liberty to establish their case and get higher compensation from management - Acquittal of these revision petitioners in criminal prosecution will no way stand in way of victims seeking further compensation if they desire to claim - In result of above discussions this court hold that prosecution has failed to establish culpable state of mind of revision petitioners herein - They are not criminally liable - Hence judgment of courts below are liable to be set aside in respect of sentence As far compensation awarded by trial court shall stand - It is to be treated as compensation under tortuous liability - Revision are allowed.
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
1. These three revision petitions are preferred by Dr.Nelson Jesudasan, Dr.J.Christopher Thomas and Dr. B.Ashok who were tried as accused for offence under section 338 of IPC and found guilty by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court.
2. Before adverting to the controverted facts and grounds of revision, a brief extract of admitted facts is required for easy appreciation.
3. Joseph Eye Hospital, Tirchy was established in the year 1934 under the aegis of Tamil Evangelical Lutheran Church, a registered society formed with object of imparting education and to render medical care. The Eye Hospital is administered by the Medical Board constituted as per the memorandum of Association.
4. On 29/07/2008 between 7.00 7.30 am to 3.30 pm, cataract surgery was performed to 66 patients at Joseph Eye Hospital, Perambalur a unit of Joseph Eye Hospital, Tiruchy. On that night, most of the patients complaint about excruciating pain in the operated eye, nausea and giddiness. Next day, they were given treatment and 29 of them admitted in the Tiruchy hospital. 61 of them lost their vision of the operated eye, 5 partially lost vision of their operated eye.
5. Public went on agitation seeking compensation and action against the hospital management. A public interest litigation was file in the High Court, Madras. The district collector ordered enquiry by a team of experts. The High court in the writ petition ordered CBI to investigate.
6. CBI registered case against several persons such as the doctors who conducted the cataract surgery, anasthesitian, persons who were incharge of the management of the hospital, officials of Perambalur District Blind Control Society and unknown Public Servants.
7. After completing the investigation, CBI filed final report against following 7 persons for offences under section 37 r/w 325 IPC.
(a) Dr.Nelson Jesudasan, the Director and Medical Superintendent of Joseph Eye Hospital, Tiruchy
(b) Dr.K.Avvai, Senior Associate Director of Joseph Eye Hospital, Tiruchy.
(c) J.Christopher Thomas, the Chief Administrative Officer of Joseph Eye Hospital, Tiruchy.
(d) Dr.B.Ashok, In-charge Medical Officer, Joseph Eye Hospital, Perambalur.
(e) Dr.M.Saujanya, Medical Officer, Joseph Eye Hospital, Tiruchy.
(f) Dr.Thendral Ponnudurai, Medical Officer, Joseph Eye Hospital, Perambalur.
(g) D.Andrews, Opthalmic Technician at Joseph Eye Hospital, Perambalur.
8. The Chief Judicial Magistrate after perusing the final report and the documents relied by the prosecution, heard thee prosecutor before framing charge and found that there is no material to prima facie show existence of mens rea or motive to the accused to voluntarily and intentionally to cause grievous hurt. Material only disclose prima facie case for offence under section 338 of IPC. The prosecution challenging for the framing of charge under section 338 IPC instead of Section 37 r/w 325 IPC preferred revision petition before the III Additional District Court, Tiruchy. The district court dismissed the revision petition preferred by the CBI. Holding that framing of charge under section 338 IPC does not warrant any interference.
9. The accused were tried before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchy. Prosecution examined 33 witnesses. 85 documents were marked as exhibits P-1 to P-85. On the side of the defence 5 exhibits were marked as Ex D-1 to D-5. An album consisting of 22 photo's were marked as M.O.1 series.
10. The trial court after considering the evidence before it, held A-1, A-3 and A-4 guilty of offence under section 338 IPC. Convicted and sentenced to undergo one year Simple Imprisonment and to pay a total sum of Rs 2,75,19,620/- as compensation to the victims as mentioned in the schedule of the judgment. Rest of the accused A-2, A-5 to A-7 were not found guilty of the charge and acquitted.
11. Certain directions were also given to the authorit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.