SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3885

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
S. ARUMUGASAMY – Appellant
Versus
NIRANJAN MARDI I. A. S. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Mohan, Adv., S.R. Rajagopal, Adv., A. Srijayanthi, Adv.

JUDGMENT

S.M. Subramaniam, J.

The grievances of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner initially filed WP.No.24322 of 2010, for a declaration to declare GO.Ms.No.1396, Home Department dated 03.10.2007 is null and void as far as the petitioner is concerned, and declare inclusion of the petitioner's name in SI.No.19 in G.O.Ms.No.504, Home Department dated 29.06.2009 as illegal, null and void, unwanted and inoperative as far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent to grant opportunity to the petitioner by including his name in the promotion list or individually and the promote the petitioner fit for promotion to the post of Additional Superintendent of Police by fixing the seniority of the petitioner with effect from 07.02.2005.

2. This Court passed an order on 09.11.2010 and the relevant paragraphs are extracted hereunder :

''2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Sub Inspector of Police (Category-I) in the year 1987. He served in various places and was promoted as Inspector of Police during the year 1997 and was posted in the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-corruption, City Special Unite-III, Ch





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top