SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4111

R.SUBBIAH, C.SARAVANAN
R. Kamesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Vidyarthini – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Sumathi, Advocate
For the Respondent:A.K. Sairam, A.S., Advocates

JUDGMENT :

R. Subbiah, J.

1. By a common order dated 06.11.2012 made in OP Nos. 230 and 3128 of 2008, the learned II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai dismissed OP No. 230 of 2008 filed by the appellant/husband under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of The Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruelty and allowed the petition filed by the respondent/wife in OP No. 3128 of 2008 under Section 9 of The Hindu Marriage Act. Challenging the said order dated 06.11.2012, the appellant/husband is before this Court with these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals.

2. From the averments made in OP No. 230 of 2008 filed by the appellant/husband, it could be inferred that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnised on 22.08.2005 at Swagatham Kalyana Mandapam, Hotel Swagath Annexe, Royapettah, Chennai as per Hindu rites and customs. The marriage was an arranged marriage and it was also registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Tambaram on 24.08.2005. At the time of marriage, the appellant was employed as Marketing Manager in a private company at Bangalore and therefore, the appellant and the respondent, after marriage, commenced their matrimonia


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top