SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4171

T.RAVINDRAN
N. Sadasivan – Appellant
Versus
K. Janarthan Nair – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Prabhakaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. In this civil revision petition, challenge is made to the fair and decreetal orders, dated 08.04.2009, passed in E.P.No.56 of 2007 in A.R.C.No.56 of 1989, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai.

2. The revision petitioner, on the basis of the decree obtained by him against the respondents in A.R.C.No.56 of 1989, preferred the execution petition, in E.P.No.56 of 2007, under Order XXI Rules 22, 37 and 38 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to arrest the respondents for realization of the decree amount passed in his favour.

3. The case of the revision petitioner, in brief, is that despite the decree passed in his favour, the respondents/defendants, though having money to pay the decreetal amount and the first respondent is doing business and earning a monthly income of Rs.30,000/- and also owns immovable properties worth about Rs.50,00,000/-; the second respondent engaged in business, thereby getting a monthly income of Rs.15,000/- and also owns immovable properties worth about Rs.30,00,000/- and the third respondent being a Government employee and drawing a monthly salary of Rs.15,000/- and also owes immovable properties worth about Rs.40,00,










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top