SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4215

R.SUBBIAH, P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
C. T. CHITRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
P.K. Rajagopal, Adv., K. Santhakumari, Adv., D. Ramalingam, Adv., Sudha Ramalingam, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

R. SUBBIAH, J.

1. The appellant has come up with this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal aggrieved by the Order dated 18.04.2013 passed in OP No. 1305 of 2006 on the file of III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai, dismissing the Original Petition filed by him for dissolution of the marriage solemnised with the respondent on 10.05.1998.

2. As per the averments contained in OP No. 1305 of 2006 filed by the appellant, the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnised on 10.05.1998 at C.V. Shah Bhavan, Rirtherdon Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai - 600 007 according to Hindu rites and customs in the presence of elders, friends and relatives of both sides. At the time of marriage, the appellant was employed in Hyderabad, therefore, after the marriage, the appellant and the respondent went to Hyderabad and started the matrimonial life at the house of the appellant at No.37, Samrat Colony, West Marred Pally, Secunderabad. According to the appellant, his married life with the respondent was not blissful and peaceful from the date of commencement of the matrimonial journey. It is his case that the respondent was always a trouble maker and she used to quarrel with the ap






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top