SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4238

T.RAVINDRAN
C. V. Karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
P. Subramanian – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.T. Syamala
For the Respondents: M. Sivavarthanan

ORDER :

T. Ravindran, J.

1. The transfer petition has been laid by the petitioner seeking transfer of the suit in O.S. No. 93 of 2012 pending on the file of the II Additional District Court, Thiruppur to any other Additional District Court at Coimbatore for disposal.

2. It is seen that O.S. No. 93 of 2012 has been laid by the respondents 1 & 2 herein against the petitioner and others for partition. It is seen that the petitioner is contesting the above said suit. Originally, the above said suit had been laid on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore and later on the constitution of the District Court in Thiruppur, it was transferred to the Principal District Court, Thiruppur and later, transferred to the II Additional District Court, Thiruppur. According to the petitioner, he had filed O.S. No. 83 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Court, FTC V, Coimbatore at Thiruppur for specific performance of the sale agreement against the third respondent herein and it is stated that the said suit ended in a decree in favour of the petitioner and the first appeal preferred by the third respondent in A.S. No. 145 of 2007 has been dismissed confirming the decree granted by








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top