S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, S.RAMATHILAGAM
Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
1. The present Habeas Corpus petition is filed to direct the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's son namely, Kiruba, aged about 23 years before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.
2. The contentions raised in the affidavit filed in support of the Habeas Corpus petition is that the petitioner is having two sons. His younger son namely, Kiruba completed his B.E., Mechanical Engineering course and was in search of job. The petitioner is running a petty shop at Thiruvilandur, Mayiladuthurai Taluk. The son of the petitioner went to Mayiladuthurai in bicycle to buy vegetables and he did not come back to home even after long time. The petitioner and his family members searched him in many places and the efforts taken by the family members and the petitioner went in vain. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to lodge a complaint before the 2nd respondent/Police on 04.06.2015 and the case was registered under the Man Missing case in Crime No.367 of 2015.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent/Polic
Dushyant Somal v. Sushma Somal
Kanu Sanyal v. District Magistrate, Darjeeling and others
Sulochana Bai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Surinderjit Singh Mand and another v. State of Punjab and another
Union of India v. Yumnam Anand M. alias Bocha alias Kora alias Suraj and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.