SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4280

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, S.RAMATHILAGAM
Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M/s. V. Sakkarapani, Advocate.
For the Respondents: M/s. R. Ravichandran, G.A.

JUDGMENT :

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

1. The present Habeas Corpus petition is filed to direct the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's son namely, Kiruba, aged about 23 years before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

2. The contentions raised in the affidavit filed in support of the Habeas Corpus petition is that the petitioner is having two sons. His younger son namely, Kiruba completed his B.E., Mechanical Engineering course and was in search of job. The petitioner is running a petty shop at Thiruvilandur, Mayiladuthurai Taluk. The son of the petitioner went to Mayiladuthurai in bicycle to buy vegetables and he did not come back to home even after long time. The petitioner and his family members searched him in many places and the efforts taken by the family members and the petitioner went in vain. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to lodge a complaint before the 2nd respondent/Police on 04.06.2015 and the case was registered under the Man Missing case in Crime No.367 of 2015.

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent/Polic

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top