SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 14

B.PUGALENDHI
K. P. Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Deivasigamani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr.R.G.Narendhiran
For the Respondent: Mr.P.M.Duraiswamy

ORDER :

1. The accused 1 to 4 and 6 in C.C.No.245 of 2009, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, have filed this application to call for the records relating to the complaint in C.C.No.245 of 2009 and to quash the same.

2. The facts of the case, in nutshell, are as follows:

2.1. The complaint in C.C.No.245 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, was filed by the respondent herein as against this petitioners and another, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 447, 427, 506(ii) IPC and Section 341 read with Section 34 IPC.

2.2. The case of the complainant is that in Arasu Village, Palladam Taluk, the respondent / complainant and his brother are having lands in Survey Nos.194/6, 194/8, 194/9, 194/5 and 194/7, totalling an extent of 4.42 ½ acres of land and they acquired the land by way of registered sale deed dated 24.08.1977. The accused 1 to 3 have purchased some properties in Survey No.194 and some other adjacent properties and started a Cotton Mill, in the name and style of M/s.KPR Cotton Mills Private Limited. They have also requested the respondent / complainant to sell their properties for the Mill. The respondent / com















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top