R.MAHADEVAN, P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
Dhanapal – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Superintendent of Police the officer-in-charge of the Police Station – Respondent
1. Calling in question the legality and validity of the communication dated 12.07.2018 issued by the respondent, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition.
2. According to the petitioner, he was working in the HR&CE Department, without any remarks and reached the position upto Commissioner and now retired from service. While so, he was implicated as one of the accused in Crime No.1 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 409, 418, 420 r/w 120-B and 477-A IPC. Apprehending arrest, he moved an anticipatory petition in Crl.OP.(MD) No.9928 of 2018, which was allowed by this Court, vide order dated 21.06.2018, subject to the following conditions:
“(a)Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned.
(b)....
(c)The petitioner shall stay in a place of his choice within the city limit of Kumbakonam for a period of sixty days from the date of surrender and execution of sureties. He shall app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.