SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 29

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Venu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
G. Mythila – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.P.Anand for Mr.K.R.A.Muthukriushnan

JUDGMENT :

1. The defendants in the original suit are the appellants before this Court in this Second Appeal.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property originally belongs to his paternal uncle Ananda Naidu who got the property by way of grant from the Government. In the suit property, the plaintiff's father and plaintiff's paternal uncle put a small hut and enjoying the same. The plaintiff's paternal uncle died intestate as a Bachelor. After his death, the entire property came into the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff's father. After the death of plaintiff's father in the year 1979, the plaintiff and his brother Munisamy are in possession and enjoyment of the property jointly. The Natham patta has been issued in the name of the plaintiff. During the lifetime of the plaintiff's father, the suit property was let out to one Babu. He was permitted to put a thatched house. Later, Babu vacated the property and handed over the possession to the plaintiff. The first defendant has no right whatsoever over the suit property. He forcibly evicted the plaintiff through his men and agent. The complaint given to the police went in vein. Despite several request made to the firs































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top