2019 Supreme(Mad) 76
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Smt. Logammal & Ors. - Petitioners
Vs.
The District Collector & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.No.20854 of 2005 and W.P. M.P. No.22785 of 2005
Decided On : 22-01-2019
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Natana Rajan
For the Respondents:Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the State to protect public lands and water bodies, and the need for swift action to remove encroachments. The judgment also emphasizes the legal principles established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in various cases related to encroachments, highlighting the protection of water bodies and public lands for the welfare of the public at large.
Headnote:
Encroachment - Government Land - Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and removal of Encroachment Act, 2007 - The judgment discusses the encroachment of 'Circar Poramboke' land by the writ petitioners and the legal provisions under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and removal of Encroachment Act, 2007. The court emphasizes the duty of the State to protect public lands and water bodies, and the need to take swift action to remove encroachments. The judgment also highlights the legal principles established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in various cases related to encroachments, emphasizing the protection of water bodies and public lands for the welfare of the public at large.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitioners sought grant of patta for land classified as 'Circar Poramboke' by the Tahsildar. The Tahsildar rejected the application citing Government policy. The court noted the encroachment of public land by the writ petitioners and the impact on water bodies and public pathways.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the writ petitioners had encroached 'Circar Poramboke' land and had no right to claim patta. The court emphasized the duty of the State to protect public lands and water bodies, and the need for swift action to remove encroachments. The court also directed the District Collectors to initiate actions to evict encroachers and provide necessary protection to officials.
Issues: The main issue was the encroachment of 'Circar Poramboke' land by the writ petitioners and their claim for grant of patta. The court also addressed the negligence and dereliction of duty by officials in protecting public lands and water bodies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the fact that the writ petitioners had encroached 'Circar Poramboke' land and were not entitled to claim patta. The court emphasized the duty of the State to protect public lands and water bodies, and the need for swift action to remove encroachments. The court also highlighted the legal principles established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in various cases related to encroachments, emphasizing the protection of water bodies and public lands for the welfare of the public at large.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the court directed the District Collectors to initiate actions to evict encroachers and provide necessary protection to officials. The court emphasized that the writ petitioners were not entitled to claim patta for the encroached 'Circar Poramboke' land.
The order passed by the Tahsildar, Egmore-Nungambakkam Taluk, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner to grant patta in respect of the land, which is classified as “Circar Poramboke” is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioners state that the writ petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of the property for long years and by virtue of their occupation for a considerable length of time, they are eligible for grant of patta. When an application is made, the 2nd respondent / The Tahsildar rejected the application on the ground that the land under the possession and occupation of the writ petitioners are classified as “Circar Poramboke” and therefore, no patta can be issued as per the Government Policy. Challenging the said order, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. The petitioners, who are also present before this Court, expressed their concern about their livelihood. This Court is of an opinion that undoubtedly the grievances of the citizen are to be addressed and redressed by the “State” in an appropriate manner. The “State” is a welfare State, is bound to implement certain schemes for the welfare of the poor landless people and the Government is periodically implementing such schemes by constructing houses for the poor landless people. Allotments are made by considering the eligibility criteria and by following the terms and conditions stipulated in the policy. The writ petitioners are also entitled to submit application for allotment of free house or site as per the Government schemes, if they are otherwise eligible in accordance with the terms and conditions of the scheme. However, this Court cannot encourage the encroachments made by the citizen in respect of the public land.
4. Encroachments are infringing the rights of all other citizen. The constitutional rights of all other citizen in respect of the public properties cannot be taken away by few individuals on account of their greediness. Encroachment of land occurs on account of greediness. Courts can never encourage the actions of such greedymen in respect of their encroachment of the public land, water bodies and water resources. It is a growing trend across the State that few greedymen, land grabbers and land mafias are encroaching the public property, water bodies and water resources and obstructing the development of our great Nation. On account of large scale encroachments, the developmental activities of the State is being paralyzed. “State” is bound to act vigilantly and no leniency can be shown in respect of the encroachers and the authorities competent are bound to invoke the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 or the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and removal of Encroachment Act, 2007 whichever is applicable. There cannot be any leniency or misplaced sympathy in respect of the encroachers. Any lapses in this regard on the part of the authorities are also must be viewed seriously. The authorities committing lapses, negligence or dereliction of duty by way of any omission or commission, must be taken note of and suitable prosecution and appropriate disciplinary actions are also to be initiated against all such officials, who all are responsible for committing an act of negligence or dereliction of duty.
5. Admittedly, the land under the occupation of the writ petitioners are classified as “Circar Poramboke”. The Status Report filed by the Tahsildar, Aminjikarai categorically enumerates as follows:-
“3. I, respectfully submit that the Sub-Inspector of Survey of this office, who inspected the said property has reported that the property is situated at New No.2, Narasimhalu Naidu Street, Ayyavoo Naidu Colony, Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029, corresponds to T.S.No.3 of Block No.4 of Vada Agaram Village and the said piece of land stands registered in the Town Survey Land Rec