SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 76

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Logammal – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Natana Rajan
For the Respondents:Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate

ORDER :

The order passed by the Tahsildar, Egmore-Nungambakkam Taluk, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner to grant patta in respect of the land, which is classified as “Circar Poramboke” is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioners state that the writ petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of the property for long years and by virtue of their occupation for a considerable length of time, they are eligible for grant of patta. When an application is made, the 2nd respondent / The Tahsildar rejected the application on the ground that the land under the possession and occupation of the writ petitioners are classified as “Circar Poramboke” and therefore, no patta can be issued as per the Government Policy. Challenging the said order, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. The petitioners, who are also present before this Court, expressed their concern about their livelihood. This Court is of an opinion that undoubtedly the grievances of the citizen are to be addressed and redressed by the “State” in an appropriate ma

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top