ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai – Appellant
Versus
V. Narayanan – Respondent
1. The instant case involves an unscrupulous litigant who has shown brazen disdain to the sanctity of orders passed by the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court and has scandalized the Judges of this Court. The litigant who himself is a lawyer has tarnished the image of the noble profession of lawyers by throwing it to the wind. The below mentioned facts undoubtedly proves the misconduct of the first respondent.
Brief facts leading to the filing of the instant revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India:
2. The first respondent claiming to be the owner of the property being a private latrine situated at No.63, Sir Theyagaraya Road, adjacent to Lakshmikantham Street, within Mambalam-Guindy Taluk Office, VIIIth Zone of Chennai Corporation, Chennai filed a suit O.S.No.328 of 2007 before the XIIth Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai for declaration that he is the owner of the suit schedule property and also for an injunction restraining the defendants in the suit from in anyway interfering with the possession of the suit schedule property by the plaintiff. The p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.