SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 167

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Pitchaimuthu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Usha Raman.
For the Respondent: Mrs. V. Srimathi.

JUDGMENT :

1. The plaintiff, who lost his suit for declaration and injunction before the courts below, is the appellant herein.

2. Case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as follows:-

The suit property and other properties described in the suit schedule and few other properties were inherited by the plaintiff through his father Rajamanika Gounder. The property originally belong to the joint family, consisting of Rajamanickam Gounder and his brother Natasa Gounder. After the lifetime of Natasa Gounder, partition took place between the family members of Rajamanickam Gounder and Natesa Gounder on 31.12.1975. The partition deed was duly registered. Under the partition deed 'A' schedule property was allotted to Rajamanickam and his wife Samboornam. 'B' schedule property was allotted to Ranganathan. 'C' schedule property was allotted to Sreenivasan (plaintiff). 'D' schedule property was allotted to Elumalai and 'E' schedule property was allotted to Krishnamurthy. Pursuant to the above partition deed, respective parties are in enjoyment and possession of their respective properties. The suit property is one of the property allotted to the share of the plaintiff parents namely Raja manickam and S



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top