ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Panruti Municipality Panruti – Respondent
1. The instant revision has been filed challenging the order dated 13.02.2012 passed in E.A.No.334 of 2009 in E.P.No.108 of 2006 in O.S.No.104 of 1997 by the District Munsif Court, Panruti.
Brief facts leading to the filing of the revision:
2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit O.S.No.104 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti. He filed a suit for declaration and possession in respect of the suit schedule property and he has also sought for recovery of possession from the respondents 3 to 7, who are the defendants 3 to 7 in the suit. After contest, the suit was partly allowed in favour of the petitioner on 22.03.2006. The trial Court granted the relief of declaration and mandatory injunction but disallowed the relief of possession. The petitioner filed E.P.No.108 of 2006 in O.S.No.104 of 1997 to execute the decree dated 22.03.2006 passed in O.S.No.104 of 1997. After receipt of the notice in the execution proceedings in E.P.No.108 of 2006, the respondents 3 to 7, who are the judgment debtors in the execution petition, filed a petition under Section 47 of CPC in E.A.No.90 of 2007 questioning the terms of decree. The said E.A. was dismissed by the Exec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.