SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 467

T.RAVINDRAN
Nandagopal – Appellant
Versus
P. Ramalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M/s. R.T. Shyamala, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree dated 31.12.2004 in A.S.No.20 of 2004 on the file of the Court of I Additional Subordinate Judge at Villupuram reversing the judgment and decree dated 04.04.2003 in O.S.No.127 of 2001 on the file of the Court of II Additional District Munsif at Thirukovilur.)

1. Challenge in this second appeal is made to the judgment and decree dated 31.12.2004 passed in A.S.No.20 of 2004 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Villupuram, reversing the judgment and decree dated 04.04.2003 passed in O.S.No.127 of 2001 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Thirukovilur.

2. The parties are referred to as per the rankings in the trial court.

3. Suit for declaration, possession and recovery of arrears of rent and mense profits.

4. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that the suit property described in plaint A schedule originally belonged to one Subramaniya Mudhaliar and after his demise, his wife Sarasammal and his children had alienated the abovesaid property to the plaintiff for a valid consideration by way of a sale deed dated 14.09.1983 along with the other items of the pr



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top