SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 554

R.SURESH KUMAR
. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

1. The prayer made in O.A.No.105 of 2019 reads thus :

"Why this Hon'ble Court should not be pleased to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the third respondent Adhoc Committee allegedly appointed in the AGM, dated 3.12.2018 from in any manner managing or interfering with the management of the Tamil Nadu State Volleyball Association, pending disposal of the arbitration proceedings?"

2. Subsequently, A.No.930 of 2019 was filed by the very same Original Applicant with the following prayer :

"Why this Hon'ble Court should not be pleased to appoint a former Judge of this Hon'ble Court as interim administrator for administering the day-today affairs of the first respondent association and conducting tournaments in order to protect the interest of sport of Volleyball in the State of Tamil Nadu pending disposal of the arbitration proceedings ?"

3. In the Original Application No.105 of 2019 as well as in A.No.930 of 2019, this Court by order, dated 01.02.2019 passed an interim order directing the respondents therein not to precipitate the matter.

4. Subsequently, when O.A.No.105 of 2019 and A.No.930 of 2019 came up for hearing before this Court, after he









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top