N.SATHISH KUMAR
Arunachalam – Appellant
Versus
Viswanathan – Respondent
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the Additional Sub Judge, Thiruvannamalai in A.S.No.10 of 2009 dated 18.12.2009 reversing the Judgment and Decree of District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai in O.S.No.431 of 1991 dated 27.02.2007.)
Aggrieved over the decree and judgment of the First Appellate Court reversing the decree and judgment of the trial court the Defendants are filed the present Second Appeal.
2. The brief facts leading to file this Second Appeal is as under:
2.a An extent of 1.10 acres in S.No.59/1 marked as 'A' Schedule property originally belonged to one Vellai Gounder and Muthusamy Gounder. One Varadarajulu Naidu has purchased the 'B' Schedule property in court auction sale in O.S.No.267 of 1939. The said Varadarajulu Naidu has sold the above 'B' schedule property to the First Plaintiff and to his brothers Ponnusamy and Chinnasamy. Eversince the date of such purchase, the purchasers were in possession of the property, as they are also acquired title by their continuous possession. 'C' Schedule property was purchased by the plaintiff from one Muthusamy Gounder. The plaintiff has constructed the house in the property
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.