G.JAYACHANDRAN
Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Inspector of Police, Cuddalore – Respondent
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and order in S.C.No.146 of 2011 dated 09.03.2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Court, Cuddalore acquitting the accused/respondents 2 and 3 from the alleged offence under Section 297(1), 323 I.P.C., and 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.)
1. The revision petitioner herein is the defacto - complainant, examined as PW-1 in S.C.No.146/2011, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore. The Criminal Revision is preferred against the order of acquittal of the trial Court holding the respondents 2 and 3 not guilty of the charges under sections 294(b), 323 IPC and Section 3 (1)(x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.
2. The defacto complainant who is the victim of crime, aggrieved by the order of acquittal of respondents 2 and 3, is entitled for preferring appeal as per the proviso to section 372 Cr.P.C. Un aware of his right, he has preferred the Criminal Revision. This Court being satisfied that the petition for criminal revision is filed on the erroneous belief that, no appeal lies, in the interest of justice, this Court treats this petition for Criminal Revisio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.