SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 768

G.JAYACHANDRAN
C. B. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Varadharaj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.A. Rajan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:C.S. Saravanan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment of the Lower Appellate Court which has reversed the judgment of conviction and sentenced passed by the trial Court in the proceedings initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act against the respondent/accused.

2. The brief facts of the case is that from C.B. Sharma the complainant/appellant Varadharaj accused/respondent borrowed money on the following dates:

1.

10.01.2008

Rs.50,000/-

2.

15.04.2008

Rs.1,50,000/-

3.

05.06.2009

Rs. 60,000/-

3. While borrowing the above said money, Varadharaj executed pro-notes for Rs.50,000/- and Rs.1,50,000/-. When he borrowed Rs.60,000/- for the 3rd time, the money was paid to him without any security on faith. After repeated demand, the accused gave the following three cheques, to discharge the liability.

(1). Cheque No.414795 dated 10.07.2010 for Rs.50,000/-.

(2). Cheque No.460048 dated 10.07.2010 for Rs.1,50,000/-.

(3). Cheque No.460049 dated 10.07.2010 for Rs.60,000/-.

4. All these cheques were drawn at Indian Overseas Bank, Manavalanagar B
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top