S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Swaathi Priya G. – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Secretary, Education Department – Respondent
1. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar said “However good a Constitution may be, if those who are implementing it are not good, it will prove to be bad. However, bad a Constitution may be, if those implementing it are good, it will prove to be good.”
The shocking information brought to the notice of this Court is that not even one Scheduled Tribe candidate is appointed as Law Professor in Tamil Government Law Colleges and Dr. Ambedkar Law University across the State after independence and for the past 72 years under the Rule of Reservation. With these background, this Court has to adjudicate the issues and find the solutions in order to extend social justice to the oppressed and depressed class of citizen of our great Nation.
2. The question of Legal importance advanced in these writ petitions are that, whether the respondents have followed the Rules of Reservation with reference to Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 as well as the 200 point roster system as contemplated in Schedule V of the said Act.
3. The second question raised is that wheth
Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. (1995) 5 SCC 173
M. Nagaraj and Others vs. Union of India
Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal vs. Mamta Bisht
R.K. Sabharwal vs. State of Punjab
Ritesh R. Sah vs. Dr. Y.L. Yamul
Rajesh Kumar Daria vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Union of India vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan
V. Yamuna Devi vs. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.