SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1078

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Hwashin Automotive India – Appellant
Versus
Chowel India Private Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. The applicant in A.No.3052 of 2019 sought for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of taking possession of the Schedule A and B Machineries along with its tools and accessories from the possession and custody of the respondent and handover the same to the representative of the applicant and in A.No.3053 of 2019 the applicant sought for a direction to the Station House Officer to provide adequate police protection for the said purpose.

2. On 15.04.2019, this Court had passed an elaborate order appointing an Advocate Commissioner and an Additional Advocate Commissioner for the said purpose and also directed the Station House Officer concerned to give proper police protection for the Advocate Commissioner and the Additional Advocate Commissioner to secure the machineries and mouldings in the process of execution of the warrant. Later, when the matter was listed before this Court on 29.04.2019, it was stated by the Advocate Commissioner and the Additional Advocate Commissioner that they were unable to execute the warrant as they had stiff resistance from not only the workers of the respondent, but also from their family members. The Advocate Commissioners































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top