PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Hwashin Automotive India – Appellant
Versus
Chowel India Private Limited – Respondent
1. The applicant in A.No.3052 of 2019 sought for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of taking possession of the Schedule A and B Machineries along with its tools and accessories from the possession and custody of the respondent and handover the same to the representative of the applicant and in A.No.3053 of 2019 the applicant sought for a direction to the Station House Officer to provide adequate police protection for the said purpose.
2. On 15.04.2019, this Court had passed an elaborate order appointing an Advocate Commissioner and an Additional Advocate Commissioner for the said purpose and also directed the Station House Officer concerned to give proper police protection for the Advocate Commissioner and the Additional Advocate Commissioner to secure the machineries and mouldings in the process of execution of the warrant. Later, when the matter was listed before this Court on 29.04.2019, it was stated by the Advocate Commissioner and the Additional Advocate Commissioner that they were unable to execute the warrant as they had stiff resistance from not only the workers of the respondent, but also from their family members. The Advocate Commissioners
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.