SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1092

P.RAJAMANICKAM
Rajagopal – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sivagangai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. G. Karuppasamy Pandiyan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: V. Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

ORDER :

(Prayer: For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.10/2019 on the file of the respondent police.)

This petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused, seeking anticipatory bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 11 (i), (ii) and Section 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act) in Crime No.10 of 2019.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 31.05.2019 at about 4.00 p.m., the defacto complainant's 5 years old daughter was playing along with her friends in front of Mariamman Temple and later, the said child went to the petitioner's house, which is situated nearer to the said temple. Subsequently, one child by name Vishal, aged about 11 years found that in the petitioner's house, the petitioner was standing in a nude position and the defacto complainant's child was also standing in a nude position. The said Vishal informed the said fact to the defacto complainant's wife Kavitha and thereafter, the said Kavitha went to the house of the petitioner and found that her child was standing in the Veranda (front ya








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top