SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1140

C.SARAVANAN
A. Edwin Raj – Appellant
Versus
A. Ruban David – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. V. Kayalvizhi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Civil Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.150 of 2014 in O.S.No.4721 of 2012 dated 06.03.2015 on the file of XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.)

1. The present Civil Revision Petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 06.03.2015 passed by the XVIII Addition City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.150 of 2014 in O.S.No.4721 of 2012.

2. By the impugned order the said Court has allowed the I.A.No.150 of 2014 in O.S.No.4721 of 2012 filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) under Order XXVI Rule 1 of C.P.C and has appointed an Advocate Commissioner to divide the suit schedule property into 9 equal shares by metes and bounds and thereby allot the shares to the respondents (plaintiffs).

3. Though respondents’ names have been printed in the cause list, there is no representation for the respondents.

4. The parties are the children of late S.Arulappan. The suit property bearing T.No.82, Ground Floor, Gowthamapuram, Chennai-600 011 comprised in Survey No.782/8 (Part), Purasawalkam Village, Chennai District, measuring to an extent of 15.42 sq.metre was allotted to the said late S.Aru














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top