IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SUBBIAH, C. SARAVANAN, JJ.
S. Jeyanthi - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi & Others - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 16011 of 2019
Decided On : 17-06-2019
Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Pregnancy Termination - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3(2)(b)(ii), Section 5 - Section 3(2)(b)(ii), Section 5
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought permission to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy due to severe abnormalities in the foetus. Medical experts recommended termination as the foetus was suffering from severe congenital defects and had little chance of survival.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's pregnancy had crossed the 26-week mark and the medical experts' opinion supported the need for termination due to the severe abnormalities in the foetus. The court concluded that allowing the pregnancy to continue would cause grave injury and mental stress to the petitioner.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should permit the petitioner to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy due to severe abnormalities in the foetus.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the expert medical opinions and previous case law to support its decision to allow the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy. The court emphasized the devastating effects of allowing the pregnancy to continue and the paramount importance of the petitioner's health and well-being.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy in an institution of her choice.
R. SUBBIAH, J.
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to undergo medical termination of the petitioner’s pregnancy under the provisions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.)
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to issue a Mandamus to the respondents to permit her to undergo medical termination of the child in her womb as contemplated under the provisions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
2. The petitioner was married to one Arun Mahalingam on 02.02.2015 and due to such wedlock, a daughter was born on 06.03.2016. While so, on 08.01.2019, the petitioner discovered, through a home pregnancy test, that she was pregnant with a second child and this was also confirmed by medical tests. When the petitioner underwent regular tests in the hospital for such pregnancy, she was informed by the Doctor attached to Razack Hospital, Rathinapuri, Kayalpatnam, Tuticorin District that the antenatal scan report dated 11.05.2019, done during her 18th week of pregnancy, disclosed that the single life foetus seemed to have Dilated Ventricles. To confirm this, the petitioner was asked to undergo further tests after two or three weeks. Accordingly, after two weeks, the petitioner underwent medical examination at Trichy, where she stayed, which disclosed that the foetus was suffering from severe congenital defects and that the growth of the foetus was becoming worse day by day. The petitioner also contends that the subsequent medical examinations undergone by her disclosed that there are severe abnormalities in the foetus such as (i) dilated Ventricles (ii) cardiac anomalies (iii) overlapped fingers (iv) polyhydramnios. Therefore, Dr. Chitra attached to Lalitha Nursing Home, Trichy opined on 04.06.2019 that it would be better to terminate the foetus as soon as possible. The same was the opinion given by Dr. Giri Selvan, attached to Annai Velankanni Nursing Home, Tirunelveli on 07.06.2019. According to the medical experts, the child in the womb suffered severe complications and may not have normal life in case of his or her birth. Further, in the event of birth of the child, it would require to undergo multiple and extensive surgeries with remote chance of survival. The petitioner therefore apprehend that even if the child is born, it will have severe abnormalities and would require multiple surgeries for survival and even those surgeries, if performed, would not result in his or her longevity. Therefore, the petitioner intends to terminate the pregnancy at the earliest stage, however, as the foetus in the womb had crossed the 20 week cycle, the petitioner has approached this Court with this writ petition.
3. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner had specifically stated that she is willing to undergo any further medical tests or consultation before any Medical Board that may be constituted by this Court for assessing the medical condition of the child in the womb. She has also stated that her husband, who is living in France, has assessed and verified the medical reports and he is also willing to give his consent for terminating the pregnancy.
4. When the writ petition was taken up for hearing by the learned single Judge of this Court on 11.06.2019, the petitioner was directed to appear for a medical examination before the Dean, Thoothukudi Government Medical College Hospital, Thoothukudi with a further direction to the Dean, Thoothukudi Government Medical College Hospital, Thoothukudi to constitute a medical board to examine the petitioner’s health condition. The Dean, Thoothukudi Government Medical College Hospital, Thoothukudi was also directed to submit a report to this Court in a sealed Cover. Accordingly, the petitioner appeared before for examination and a report was also submitted in a sealed cover and the same was also taken on record by the learned s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.