R.SUBBIAH, B.PUGALENDHI
B. Pattabhiraman – Appellant
Versus
Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Coimbatore – Respondent
1. All these Writ Petitions have been filed to call for the records of the respondent relating to impugned E-Auction Sale Notice, dated 29.08.2018 and quash the same.
2. Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions, is one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order.
3. The petitioners are the guarantors to the loan facility provided by the respondent-Bank to M/s. G.B. Engineering Enterprises Private Limited, Trichy. They are also the Directors of the said Company. The said Company had availed various financial facilities with the respondent-Bank for the past 37 years and the Company was given financial facility limit upto Rs. 36.28 Crores, out of which, the said Company availed only Rs. 36 Crores as loan. As against the said loan, the valuable properties/assets of the said Company were given as "primary security" by creating equitable mortgage with the respondent, totally valued at Rs. 87.5 Crores. The said Company remained insolvent and the dues were mounting. Hence, the respondent-Bank initiated measures against the said Company under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 200
Amrit Lal Goverdhan Lalan vs. State Bank of Travencore
Bank of Bihar Ltd. vs. Dr. Damodar Prasad and Another
Edward Mills Co. Ltd. vs. State of Ajmer
Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd. vs. Biswanath Jhunjhunwala
State of Kerala and Others vs. Mar Appraem Kuri Co. Ltd. and Others
State Bank of India vs. Indexport Registered and Others
State Bank of India vs. V. Ramakrishnan and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.