SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1252

P.N.PRAKASH, B.PUGALENDHI
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
State, Rep By The Inspector of Police, Koodankulam Police Station – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Thiruvadikumar
For the Respondent: Mr. K.K. Ramakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

P.N. PRAKASH, J.

1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No. 596 of 2015, on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. The Trial Court framed as many as three charges, as detailed below.

Charge Penal Provisions

Charge

Penal Provisions

1

447 IPC

2

302 IPC

3

397 IPC

2. By Judgment dated 22.09.2016, the Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him, as detailed below:-

Section of Law

Sentence of imprisonment

Fine amount

302 IPC

To undergo imprisonment for life.

Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

447 IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.

No fine

379 IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.

No fine

The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal.

3. The facts of the case lie a narrow compass:-

The appellant, a shepherd and native of S.S. Puram in Tirunelveli District, was tending cattle in Kerala. He































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top