P.N.PRAKASH, B.PUGALENDHI
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
State, Rep By The Inspector of Police, Koodankulam Police Station – Respondent
P.N. PRAKASH, J.
1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No. 596 of 2015, on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. The Trial Court framed as many as three charges, as detailed below.
Charge Penal Provisions
Charge
Penal Provisions
1
447 IPC
2
302 IPC
3
397 IPC
2. By Judgment dated 22.09.2016, the Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him, as detailed below:-
Section of Law
Sentence of imprisonment
Fine amount
302 IPC
To undergo imprisonment for life.
Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
447 IPC
To undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.
No fine
379 IPC
To undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.
No fine
The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal.
3. The facts of the case lie a narrow compass:-
The appellant, a shepherd and native of S.S. Puram in Tirunelveli District, was tending cattle in Kerala. He
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.