SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 4301

V.PARTHIBAN
K. Perumal – Appellant
Versus
S. Shakiladevi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R. Gururaj, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Meenal

ORDER :

V. PARTHIBAN, J.

1. The present criminal revision case has been filed against the order dated 27.06.2018 passed in Cr.M.P.No.199 of 2017 in M.C.No.58 of 2014 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner herein for second DNA test.

2. According to the petitioner that he was married to the first respondent and a child was born after the marriage, the second respondent herein. But, according to the petitioner, he was not a biological father. Since the paternity of the second respondent was being questioned, a criminal miscellaneous petition was filed i.e., Crl.M.P.No.1005 of 2015, seeking for DNA test. The said Criminal miscellaneous petition was allowed. Both the parties were directed to appear before the Government Headquarters Hospital, Cuddalore. After completion of the DNA Test as per the direction of the Trial Court, a report was submitted before the Trial Court. Thereafter, while maintenance case was being taken up for hearing, the second application was filed by the petitioner herein for the DNA test stating that there was some discrepancy in the first DNA report.

3. Before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top